TORO’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Yi Au Lau v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service · Costello v. United States · Trias-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Illinois Migrant Council v. Pilliod
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cases may arise in which the manner of seizing evidence is so egregious that to rely on it would offend the fifth amendment's due process requirement of fundamental fairness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]o be admissible in deportation proceedings, evidence must be probative and its use fundamentally fair”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.