TINAJERO

Interim Decision #2803




                              MATTER OF TINAJERO

                          In Deportation Proceedings
                                     A-34262790
                        Decided by Board July 8, 1980

(1) Under Section 1203.4 of the California Penal Code an individual is eligible for
  expungement of his conviction in those cases where the sentence was suspended,
  probation was granted, and the conditions of probation have been fulfilled.
(2) In the case of an alien convicted in California of a crime involving moral turpitude,
  who has received a suspended sentence with probation and is'eligible for expungement
  under Section 1203.4 of the California Penal. Code, it is the policy of the Immigration
  and Naturalization Service to defer the institution of deportation proceedings until
  the respondent has had a reasonable opportunity to apply for an expungement. Board
  remanded record to District Director so thatproceedings may be held in abeyance for
  that purpose.
CHARGE
 Order: Act of 1952—Sec. 241(a)(4), I&N Act [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(4)j—Convicted and
                       sentenced to confinement for a year or more
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Jose Angel Rodriguez, Esquire
                       304 South Broadway, Suite 532
                       Los Angeles, California 90013
Br. Milhollan, Chairman; Maniatis, Appleman, Maguire, and Farb, Board Members


   This is an appeal from an immigration judge's decision dated May 4,
1978, in which the respondent was found deportable under section
241(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(4)
and was denied voluntary departure. The respondent has appealed.
The record will be remanded to the Service.
   The respondent is a 25-year-old single male alien, a native and
citizen of Mexico. On February 15, 1977, he was convicted in the
Superior Court of California for the offense of burglary in violation of
Section 259 of the California Penal Code and sentenced on March 10,
1977, to one year in the county jail. Execution of the sentence was
suspended and the respondent was granted probation for a period of
five years.
   Based on the above, the immigration judge found the respondent
                                          424
                                                             Interim Decision #2803
deportable under section 241(a)(4) of the Act. He further found that
the crime of burglary is a crime involving moral turpitude and therefore the respondent is statutorily ineligible for the privilege of voluntary departure.
  We agree with the finding of the immigration judge that the respondent is deportable under section 241(a)(4) for having pled guilty to
the crime of burglary. We further agree that the crime of burglary is
one involving moral turpitude. However, in a memorandum dated
February 14, 1980, the Deputy General Counsel of the Immigration and
Naturalization Service advised this Board that the Service "has a
policy of deferring the institution of deportation proceedings of an
alien convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude in those cases
where the sentence was suspended and probation was granted which
made the alien eligible for expungement under section 1203.4 of the
California Penal Code."' It is the policy to defer proceedings until the
individual has had "a reasonable opportunity to obtain an expungement of his conviction." It was noted in the memorandum that the
Service Operations Instructions were being amended to reflect that
policy. The Deputy General Counsel asked that the record be remanded
"to the Service so that it [could] be held in abeyance pending the
outcome of the respondent's application for an expungement."
   The respondent in this case did have his sentence suspended and
probation was granted. Therefore, in view of the policy statement by
the Service which applies to the circumstances of this case we will
remand the record to the District Director so that the proceedings may
be held in abeyance until the respondent has had a reasonable opportunity to apply for expungement of his conviction under section 1203.4 of
the California Penal Code.
   ORDER The record is remanded to the District Director for
further proceedings consistent with the foregoing order.




  ' The Service policy apparently resulted from a January 17, 1961, memorandum from
the Attorney General to the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization. The
memorandum provided in part that "..., in the cases of alien probationers who may avail
themselves of the benefits of section 1203.4 after fulfilling the conditions of probation or
after an earlier discharge from probation, the Service should not institute proceedings
under section 241(a)(4) during the period that their probation is in effect or during the
pendency of proceedings under section 1203.4." Cf. Matter of G. , 9 I&N Dec.159 (BIA
                                                                   —


       A.G. 1961).

                                            AOM