Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 I. & N. Dec. 462

MUSHARRAF

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1980

Board of Immigration Appeals · decided 1980-07-01

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1152 (§ 202 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Decided 1980-07-01

Interim Decision #2814




                            MATTER OF MUSHARRAF

                          In Deportation Proceedings
                                     A-20906714
                      Decided by Board August 20, 1880
(1) An alien admitted to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J) is not eligible to apply for an
  immigrant visa or permanent residence until he has resided and has been physically
  present in his country of nationality or last place of residence for two years following
  departure from the United States or has received a waiver of this 2-year residency
  requirement from the Attorney General.
(2) A "no objection" letter from the Embassy of Pakistan, the respondent's last place of
  residence, does not constitute a "waiver" within the meaning of section 212(e) of the
  Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1152(e).
(2) An alien who graduates from a medical eared not accredited by a body approved for
  that purpose by the Commissioner of Education, and who is coming to this country to
  perform services as a member of the medical profession is excludable unless he has
  passed Parts I and II of the National Board of Medical Examiners Examination or its
  equivalent. Section 212(a)(82) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.
  1182(a)(32), added by the Act of October 12, 1976 (
90 Stat. 2300
-2303), amended by the
  Act of August 1, 1977 (
91 Stat. 394
), and effective January 10, 1977.
(4) An exchange visitor who filed an application for adjustment of status on August 7,
  1976, while ineligible under section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8
  U.S.C. 1182(e), and who then came within the provisions of section 212(a)(32) of the
  Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.1182(a)(32), is precluded from adjusting his
  status despite the subsequent grant of a waiver by the Service on June 14, 1977 of the
  2-year residency requirement under section 212(e) of the Act.

OHARGC
 Orden Act of 1952—Sec. 241(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2)]—Nonimmigrant—remained
                         longer than permitted
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT:                         QN BEHALF OF SEuvwx:
 Stanley J. Worn, Esquire                          Martin F. Spiegel, Esquire
 29 South La Salle Street                          Trial Attorney
 Chicago, Illinois 60608
 By Milhollan, Chairman; Maniatis, Appleman, Maguire, and Farb, Board Members


  This case is before us on appeal from the immigration judge's denial
of a motion to reopen to apply for adjustment of status under section
                                          462
                                                          Interim Decision #2814
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1255. The appeal
will be dismissed.
  The respondent is a 33-year-old native of India and citizen of Pakistan. He entered this country on June 29, 1974, at New York as an
exchange visitor and was authorized to remain until June 28, 1975. On
June 14, 1976, an Order to Show Cause was issued charging the respondent with deportability under section 241(a)(2) of the Act, 8 U.S.C.
1251(a)(2), as an alien who remained longer than permitted. The
respondent filed an adjustment application, Form 1-485, on August 6,
1976, based upon an approved third-preference visa petition. At his
deportation hearing on September 27, 1976, the respondent, through
counsel, refrained from requesting a decision on the adjustment application and did not even ask that it be incorporated in the deportation
hearing record. He reported that he was preparing to request that the
State Department recommend that the 2-year foreign residence requirement of section 212(e) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(e) be waived, and
he requested extended voluntary departure. He was found deportable
as charged and was granted 60 days voluntary departure.
  On February 4, 1977, the respondent moved to reopen the proceedings.' The motion was denied on April 1, 1977, on the ground that the
respondent had failed to obtain a waiver of the 2 year residency   -


requirement from the Attorney General. The immigration judge found
that the "no objection" letter from the Embassy of Pakistan did not
constitute a "waiver."
   On February 15, 1977, the Service received a recommendation from
the State Department that the respondent be granted a section 212(e)
waiver. The Service granted the waiver on June 14, 1977. Although
neither the State Department recommendation nor the Service waiver
appears in the record, the Service concedes that both documents were
issued.
  The respondent again moved to reopen the proceedings on August
19, 1977. The immigration judge denied the motion on March 10, 1980.
Although the respondent had received a waiver of the foreign residency requirement under section 212(e) of the Act, the immigration
judge found that section 212(a)(32) of the Act barred his admission
into the United States. The respondent was therefore ineligible to
adjust his status. We agree.
  On appeal, the respondent contends that all motions relate back to
the date that he first filed his adjustment application. Since that date
was August 6, 1976, 5 months before section 212(a)(32) became effec-

  ' While no formal "motion" appears in the record file. dated February 4, 1977, the
respondent on appeal refers to his "motions," which include a February 4, 1977, motion
and August 19, 1977, motion.

                                         4“:1
Interim Decision #2814
tive, the respondent claims that he was not required to meet its
requirements.
  Prior to June 14, 1977, the respondent's application for adjustment
of status could not have been deemed properly filed. See 8 C.F.R.
2452(a)(2). Section 245 of the Act provides that the status of an alien
who was inspected and admitted into the United States may be adjusted by the Attorney General to an alien lawfully admitted for
permanent residence if he is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and
is admissible for permanent residence. In pertinent part, section 212(e)
of the Act, provides that no person who was admitted under section
101(a)(15)(J) of the Act shall be eligible to apply for an immigrant visa
or permanent residence until he has resided and has been physically
present in his country of nationality or last place of residence for two
years following departure from the United States or has received a
waiver of this 2-year residency requirement from the Attorney
General.
   Section 212(a)(32) added by the Act of October 12, 1976 (
90 Stat. 22110
 2302) and amended by the Act of August 1. 1977 (
91 Stat. 394
),
    -


became effective January 10, 1977. As of January 10,197?, an, alien who
graduated from a medical school not accredited by a body approved for
that purpose by the Commissioner of Education and who is coming to
this country to perform services as a member of the medical profession
is excludable unless he has passed Parts I and II of the National Board
of Medical Examiners Examination (or its equivalent).
   At the time the respondent filed his adjustment application he was
clearly ineligible to adjust his status inasmuch as he had failed to
obtain a waiver of the residency requirement. Once he had received the
waiver, he became eligible to< apply for adjustment. On June 14, 1977,
the date the respondent received a waiver and established his eligibility to apply for adjustment of status, section 212(a)(32) had gone
into effect which excluded the respondent unless he could establish
that he was exempt. The respondent has failed to establish that he was
exempt. The respondent has failed to establish that he passed Parts I
and II of the National Board of Medical Examiners Examination. The
respondent is therefore ineligible to adjust his status. Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed.
   ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.




                                  464

/17/indec/462 · .json · Public domain