17 Kan. App. 2d 8 - State v. Shuster’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2010
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · State v. McGlothlin · 11 Kan. App. 2d 362 - State v. Scherer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Mandatory fines, such as the fines for driving while under the influence in violation of K.S.A 8-1567, are fines that are mandatory which ‘shall’ be imposed along with set ranges of confinement. “ ... If the judge, in his or her discretion, imposes a fine exceeding (he mandatory minimum, the K.S.A. 21-4607 criteria must be taken into consideration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.