Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 Misc. 2d 950

Harrell v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided July 22, 1959

New York Court of Claims · decided 1959-07-22

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1973

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“with respect to matters other than those arising out of his arrest or detention.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Johnson v. Rockefeller

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1959-07-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sidney Squire, J.

¶1The defendant moves, pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the claim because the claimant has not legal capacity to sue ”. Said claimant is incarcerated in Sing Sing Prison serving a sentence of 5 to 10 years.

¶2The movant relies upon section 510 of the Penal Law, bearing the heading ‘1 Forfeiture of office and suspension of civil rights ’ ’, which suspends, during the term of claimant’s sentence, his civil right to institute or continue this negligence action with respect to matters other than those arising out of his arrest or detention ”.

¶3Claimant opposes the motion by urging that said section 510 is unconstitutional in that it violates section 1 of article I of the Constitution of our State and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

¶4We rule that said section is not unconstitutional. The motion to dismiss the claim is granted. The claim is dismissed without prejudice to renewal when the proscription in section 510 is no longer applicable.

¶5Short-form order signed.

/17/misc2d/950 · .json · Public domain