Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 MOAPP 366 - Page v. Bettes

Page v. Bettes’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2011

13 state decisions

4018851890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gerard B. Allen & Co. v. Frumet Mining & Smelting Co. · Henderson v. Henderson · Livermore v. Wrigh · Douglas v. St. Louis Zinc Co. · Alexander v. Merry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But when work or material is done or furnished, all going to the same general purpose, as the building of a house or any of its parts, though such work be done or ordered at different times, yet if the several parts form an entire sale, or are so connected together as to show that the parties had it in contemplation that the whole should form but one, and not distinct matters'of settlement, the whole account must be treated as a unit, or as being but a single contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.