Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 MONT 220 - Leyson v. Davis

Leyson v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
8
states following
September 1962
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 1962 · most notably State v. Greeno (1959), Burns v. Smith (1898)

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

14018951900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basket v. Hassell · McNeil v. . the Tenth National Bank · Ridden v. . Thrall · Johnston v. Laflin · Grymes v. . Hone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * we believe in adhering to the rule that, where a party claims by way of a donation causa mortis, he should make out a strong case. It is therefore the duty of the court to give particular heed to every fact and circumstance in the testimony, being very careful to avoid any conclusion not fully sustained by credible evidence. On the other hand, there is a cardinal principle never to be lost sight of, namely, that the law permits a man to make gifts in apprehension of his death; and if he has done so in due manner, while in full possession of his senses, and with deliberation and intent to bestow his personal property upon another, it would be a fearful injustice to nullify that intent, and take away the property from the person justly entitled thereto.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.