Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 N.C. App. 162

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1972

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1972-12-20

Decided 1972-12-20

VAUGHN, Judge.

¶1Defendant’s counsel states that, except for the admission of certain exhibits, he is unable to discover prejudicial error in the trial and urges that the court scrutinize the record to determine if error appears. The exhibits, which were introduced over defendant’s objections, were relevant and their admission into evidence did not constitute prejudicial error. We have reviewed the record and find no prejudicial error.

¶2No error.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.
/17/ncapp/162 · .json · Public domain