Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 N.C. App. 620 - Taylor v. Askew

17 N.C. App. 620 - Taylor v. Askew’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pritchard v. Scott · Garris v. . Byrd · Brown v. . Glass · Warlick v. . Lowman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence ... was in sharp conflict as to the relative costs of constructing a road over the existing spoil bank as compared with the costs of constructing a new cartway to be condemned across respondents' lands. Again, we agree with the trial court that, even if petitioners' evidence in this regard be accepted as true, the conclusion is not thereby compelled that the more expensive road along the spoil bank is not "an adequate means of ingress and egress." Petitioners are not entitled to condemn a cartway across respondents' lands merely because this might prove the least expensive means for obtaining access to their property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`placing tiles in approximately twenty farm drainage ditches....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an adequate means of ingress and egress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.