State v. Newton’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably Leamer v. Fauver (2002), State v. Wingler (1957)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Application of Kershner · Port of New York Authority v. Township of Weehawken · 30 N.J. Super. 382 - State v. Newton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“providing for the needs and requirements of such person according to the individual circumstances of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it shall be the duty of the court, upon recommendation of the Diagnostic Center, to submit the offender to a program of specialized treatments for his mental and physical aberrations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“within the jurisdiction of the department.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.