¶1There is no equity in the bill. The assignment by the executor, of his individual interest in a mortgage and decree belonging to the estate of his testator, passed to the assignee no title to the mortgage, nor to the proceeds thereof. The executor had no individual interest in the trust fund in his hands belonging to the estate of his testator. He could not assign the trust funds to pay his individual indebtedness. All the individual interest which the executor, as a creditor of the estate of his testator, could have in the funds of the estate, would be a right to the payment of his debt, or a ratable proportion thereof, out of the assets, upon a settlement of the estate. For all that appears by the bill, the estate is insolvent. Admitting that the *259estate is solvent, and that a debt was due from, the estate to the executor, nothing passed by the assignment but an equitable interest, which the assignee might enforce against the assets in the hands of the administrator, upon the settlement of the estate.
17 N.J. Eq. 257
Chavez v. Schmidt
Decided May 15, 1865
New Jersey Court of Chancery · decided 1865-05-15
The hill charges that Nicholas Peiffer, the executor of Peter Peiffer, deceased, holding and owning, as such executor, a bond and mortgage for $5000, and being a creditor of the estate of his testator, on the 4th of January, 1862, assigned all his individual share, right, title, and interest, in the said bond and mortgage, and in the decree theretofore made for the foreclosure thereof, to the complainant, as collateral security for a debt of $3000, due from Nicholas Peiffer,…
Decided 1865-05-15