Goldenberg v. Law’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Fullen v. Fullen (1915), City of Albuquerque v. Ackerman (1971)
57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Choen v. State · Candelaria ex rel. Candelaria v. Miera · Cornell v. Barnes · United States v. Biena · Kimbrell v. Kimbrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" ‘(1) Because they would defeat their own solemn acts under oath. (2) Because their admission would open the door to tamper with jurymen after they had given their verdict. (3) Because they would be the means, in the hands of dissatisfied juror, to destroy a verdict at any time after he had assented to it.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Embrey“to set aside the verdict by his own affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.