¶1 dissenting. A reading of the German decree and the trial court’s findings shows that the conditions of paragraph (J) of Section 3105.01, Revised Code, have not been met. While the facts of this case may illuminate a deficiency in our present divorce laws, the correction of that situation is the function of the General Assembly.
17 Ohio App. 2d 101
244 N.E.2d 512
Rousculp v. Rousculp
Decided December 17, 1968
Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1968-12-17
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1990
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1968-12-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →