17 Ohio App. 2d 164 - State v. Whittington’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably In re Sekulich (1981), In re Becker (1974)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gault · Kent v. United States · In re Whittington · In the Matter of Buddy Lynn Whittington · Workman v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * It is our finding that such order of referral to the Juvenile Diagnostic Center [after a finding of delinquency] is not a final appealable order; rather such referral is but a procedural incident such as is analogous to the referral of an adult under the provisions of Section 2947.-25, Revised Code, to an approved state facility for observation. See State v. Thomas, 175 Ohio St. 563 , which holds such a referral of an adult not to be a final appealable order.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““An order made under the provisions of Section 2151.26, Bevised Code, recognizing a juvenile to appear before the Common Pleas Court is a final appealable order.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall have such jurisdiction as may be provided by law”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re D.H.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.