17 Ohio App. 3d 258 - State v. Montgomery’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2023
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · 148 Ohio St. 473 - State v. Petro · 5 Ohio App. 3d 92 - State v. Howell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“maximum daily dose in the usual dose range”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) by stipulation, (2) by expert testimony as to what a standard pharmaceutical reference manual prescribes, or (3) by a properly proven copy of the manual itself.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n amount equal to or exceeding two hundred solid dosage units, sixteen grams, or sixteen milliliters of a 6. In this case, appellant's conviction was further elevated to a felony of the first degree because the drug offense allegedly occurred within the vicinity of a school. - 16 - Warren CA2012-04-034 compound, mixture, preparation, or substance that is or contains any amount of a schedule III anabolic steroid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Howard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.