Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 OHIOST3D 132 - State v. Davidson

State v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

146
cited by 146 later decisions
2
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 143 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Grubb (1986), State v. French (1995)

3 federal appellate · 143 state decisions

59019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Sanges · State v. Buckingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * renders the state's proof with respect to the pending charge so weak in its entirety that any reasonable possibility of effective prosecution has been destroyed * * *.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(A) A prosecuting attorney * * * may appeal as a matter of right any decision of a trial court in a criminal case, or any decision of a juvenile court in a delinquency case, which decision grants * * * a motion to suppress evidence * * * and may appeal by leave of the court to which the appeal is taken any other decision, except the final verdict, of the trial court in a criminal case or of the juvenile court in a delinquency case.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The *Page 5 determination of whether a motion is a `motion to suppress' or a `motion in limine' does not depend on what it is labeled. It depends on the type of relief it seeks to obtain.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.