Haffner v. Dobrinski’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1935
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hennessey v. Woolworth · Williams v. Morris · Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan Railroad · Bruck v. Tucker · Brown v. Hoag
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * No injunction shall operate until the party obtaining the same shall give an undertaking in an amount fixed by the court or judge allowing the same to secure to the party the damages he may sustain if it be finally decided that the injunction ought not to have been granted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Whitehead
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.