Hartman v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1888
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 1949
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McMillan v. Mich. S. & N. I. R. R. · Reynolds v. State, ex rel. Titus · Hudson v. Solomon · People Ex Rel. Dailey v. . Livingston · O'Gorman v. Richter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Every consideration of public policy, as well as the ordinary rules of evidence, require that the party offering this evidence should establish the fact that the ballots are genuine.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thornhill v. Wear
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.