Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 P.3d 1135

410 UtahAdv.Rep. 28

State v. Hansen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 14, 2000

Court of Appeals of Utah · decided 2000-12-14

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2002

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-12-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge

¶1{concurring in result):

¶2129 I agree with my colleagues that Hansen was illegally detained when the officer asked for permission to search his vehicle and conducted that search. I also agree that the trial court erred in determining that Hansen gave his clear and unequivocal consent to the search. Having made that determination, I would not undertake to analyze whether Hansen's non-consent was obtained without duress or coercion. I would therefore concur in the conclusion that the trial court erred in denying Hansen's motion to suppress.

/17/p3d/1135 · .json · Public domain