State v. GS’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2020
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 128 Wash. 2d 492 - City of Seattle v. Fontanilla · State v. Alvarez · State v. Hickman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he perpetrator knowingly threaten to inflict bodily injury by communicating directly or indirectly the intent to inflict bodily injury; the person threatened must find out about the threat although the perpetrator need not know nor should know that the threat will be communicated to the victim; and words or conduct of the perpetrator must place the person threatened in reasonable fear that the threat will be carried out.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“To convict the defendant of the crime of harassment, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) That on or about July 17, 2003, the defendant knowingly threatened: (a) to cause bodily injury immediately or in the future to Judge Craig J. Matheson', and (2) That the words or conduct of the defendant placed Cynthia Clark in reasonable fear that the threat would be carried out.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) A person is guilty of harassment if: • (a) Without lawful authority, the person knowingly threatens: (i) To cause bodily injury immediately or in the future to the person threatened or to any other person [and] (b) The person by words or conduct places the person threatened in reasonable fear that the threat will be carried out.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.