People v. Mossmann’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
1 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. Arguello · Lybarger v. People · Rowe v. People · People v. Fuller · Brown v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion for appointment of experts when no showing was made that the services sought by the defendant were reasonable, necessary, or in any way helpful to her defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Orozco“A trial court's determination that a defendant waived the constitutional right to counsel will be upheld if the record affirmatively establishes that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived that right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Smith“where the defendant cannot show that such services are reasonable, necessary, or in any way helpful to the defense, the trial court is not required to grant a motion requesting such services”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Orozco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.