17 Pa. Super. 56
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1901
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1901-04-16
Appeal, No. 6, March T., 1901, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Sept. T., 1900, on verdict for plaintiff in case of D. M. Epler, Administrator of George Strickland, Deceased, v. David M. Metzger. Assumpsit on a promissory note.
Affirmed · Decided 1901-04-16
¶1It is unnecessary to discuss the motion to quash. The assignments of error are without merit. The question was not as to the effect of an admittedly genuine receipt in full, but as *59to the execution of the receipt offered by the defendant. The instructions of the learned judge as to the burden of proof were quite as favorable to the defendant as he had a right to ask.
¶2Judgment affirmed.