Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 S.C.L. 369

Guphill v. Isbell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1830

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1830-01-15

Tried before Mr. Justice Huger, at Fairfield, Fall Term, 1829. The plaintiff in this case intermarried with Samuel S. Taylor, pendente lite, and, at the succeeding term, the defendant moved for leave to plead the coverture in abatement, which the presiding Judge refused. After verdict for plaintiff, the defendant moved for a new trial, upon this, among other grounds.

Decided 1830-01-15

Johnson, J.

¶1The authorities all agree, that the marriage of a feme sole plaintiff, pendente lite, may be pleaded in abatement, provided it be pleaded puis darrein continuance. Bae. Abr. Abatement. G. This is a matter of substance, and not of form merely ; and the defendant having brought himself within the rule, it was a right, the exercise of which the Circuit Court bad *370no discretion to withhold from him. The Court erred, there- , , , ... fore, m rejecting the plea, and on that ground a new trial is granted to the defendant, with leave to file the plea mine pro tunc.

Nott, J. and Colcock, J. concurred.

¶2Motion granted.

/17/scl/369 · .json · Public domain