¶1The abstract in this case was filed in this court on March 9, 1903, and the case placed on the April, 1903, calendar, and regularly submitted for decision under rule 21 of this court. Although more than six months have elapsed since such submission, no brief has been filed on the part of the appellant, and m such case this court will presume that the appeal has been abandoned, and will either dismiss the same or affirm the judgment, as it may deem proper. Benedict v. Smith, 10 S. D. 35, 71 N. W. 139; Giles v. Hawkeye M. Co., 11 S. D. 222, 76 N. W. 928; Russel v. Deadwood Development Co. 16 S. D. 644 94 N. W. 693. In this case the appeal will be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
17 S.D. 514
Welch v. Synoground
Decided December 29, 1903
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1903-12-29
<p>Appeal from circuit court, Brown county; Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge.</p> <p>Action by James H. Welch against N. O. P. Synoground. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1913
2 state decisions
Relies on Chicago, M. & St. P. R'y. Co. v. Brink · Benedict v. Smith · Giles v. Hawkeye Gold-Mining Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Appeal dismissed · Decided 1903-12-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →