Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 So. 3d 100 - Babb v. State

17 So. 3d 100 - Babb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 478 So. 2d 1017 - Harper v. State · 921 So. 2d 292 - Spicer v. State · Johnson v. ST. DOMINICS-JACKSON MEM. HOSP. · Downs v. State · Taylor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A lesser-included-offense instruction should be granted unless the trial judge — and ultimately this Court — can say, taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the accused, and considering all reasonable favorable inferences which may be drawn in favor of the accused from the evidence, that no reasonable jury could find the defendant guilty of the lesser-included offense (and conversely not guilty of at least one essential element of the principal charge).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.