Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 SO3D 1081 - Hill v. Carroll County

Hill v. Carroll County’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nevada v. United States · Russell v. SunAmerica Securities, Inc. · 891 So. 2d 224 - Harrison v. Chandler-Sampson Ins., Inc. · 704 So. 2d 1336 - Little v. v. & G Welding Supply, Inc. · Pray v. Hewitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ Clauses of action are the same if they arise from the same “transaction”; whether they are products of the same “transaction” is to be determined by “giving weight to such considerations as whether the facts are related in time, space, origin, or motivation[;] whether they form a convenient trial unit[;] and whether their treatment as a unit conforms to the parties’ expectations or business understanding or usage.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) identity of the subject matter of the action; (2) identity of the cause of action; (3) identity of the parties to the cause of action; and (4) identity of the quality or character of a person against whom the claim is made.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[O]nce the four identities of res judicata have been established, any claims that could have been brought in the prior action are barred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.