Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 SO3D 1129 - Harding v. State

Harding v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Brown v. State · 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State · 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the cumulative-error doctrine, individual errors, which are not reversible in themselves, may combine with other errors to make up reversible error, where the cumulative effect of all errors deprives the defendant of a fundamentally fair trial. Under this reasoning, if there are no individual errors, there can be no cumulative error that warrants reversal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.