Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 So. 3d 310

Dennis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-05-20

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2011

3 state decisions

Relies on Peterson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-05-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT AND/OR MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

DAMOORGIAN, J.

¶2Clarence Dennis filed a Motion for Rehearing and/or Certification of Conflict and/or Motion for Clarification. We deny the motion for rehearing and/or clarification. We certify conflict with the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Peterson v. State, 983 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.
/17/so3d/310 · .json · Public domain