Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 So. 3d 338

Saldana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-07-31

Relies on State v. Spencer

Decided 2009-07-31

PER CURIAM.

¶1 We affirm the appealed order. Moreover, after having painstakingly collected *339 and reviewed this appellant’s series of post-conviction filings and appeals, which are remarkable for their incoherence, inaccuracy and frivolousness, we deem it appropriate to order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999), that appellant Saldana show cause within ten days from the date of this opinion why he should not be barred from any further pro se filings in this court concerning his 1992 and 1999 convictions.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
/17/so3d/338 · .json · Public domain