Hood v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Miller v. California · New York v. Ferber · Grayned v. City of Rockford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1.whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child’s genitalia or pubic area; 2. whether the setting of the visual depiction is sexually suggestive, i.e.[,] in a place or pose generally associated with sexual activity; 3. whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of the child; 4. whether the child is fully or partially clothed, or nude; 5. whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity; [or] 6. whether the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Today, we adopt the above-enumerated Dost factors”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bolles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.