Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 SO3D 652 - Hubbard v. Bentley

Hubbard v. Bentley’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gross v. Gross · 386 So. 2d 749 - Barnhill v. Barnhill · Southern Guaranty Insurance Company v. Wales · Stacey v. Saunders · Schmidt v. LADNER CONST. CO., INC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]rial courts may not dispose of property addressed in an antenuptial agreement in a manner that is inconsistent with that agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.