Schneider v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 2003
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pittman v. State · Huddleston v. Jennings · Rhodes v. Commonwealth · Ellis v. Commonwealth · Yost v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever during the continuance of the term of imprisonment there is pending in any other party state any untried indictment, ... on the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against the prisoner, he shall be brought to trial within one hundred eighty (180) days after he shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court of the prosecuting officer’s jurisdiction written notice of the place of his imprisonment and his request for a final disposition to be made of the indictment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ward v. Commonwealth“given or sent by the prisoner to the warden,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.