Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 SW3D 660 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Magnolia Venture Capital Corp. v. Mississippi Department of Economic & Community Development · Lowe v. Cantrell · Oldham v. State · Devis v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our holding on this issue is strictly limited to the use of Rule 2(b). We should not be understood as restricting court of appeals’ power to abate an appeal and remand a case under authority other than Rule 2(b). When judicial resources can be conserved in the interest of justice, we encourage the courts of appeals to adopt and continue to use methods for resolving issues sooner rather than later, as long as such methods are legally endorsed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that trial counsel thought his duties were completed with the end of the trial, and had thereafter abandoned the appellant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.