M'Millan v. M'Neill’s Empirical Analysis
17 U.S. 209 · 1819
Citation profile
2 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2009 · most notably Ogden v. Saunders (1827), Baldwin v. Hale (1863)
2 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blanchard v. Russell · Smith v. Smith · Innes v. Miller · M'Kimm v. Riddle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that this case was not distinguishable in principle from the preceding case of Sturges v. Crowninshield,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ogden v. Saunders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.