Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 U.S. 225 - Eliason v. Henshaw

Eliason v. Henshaw’s Empirical Analysis

17 U.S. 225 · 1819

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2016 · most notably Burton v. United States (1906), Minneapolis St Ry Co v. Columbus Rolling-Mill Co (1886)

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 23 states

170181918201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carr v. Duval · Insurance Co. v. Lyman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is an undeniable principle of the law of contracts that an offer of a bargain by one person to another imposes no obligation upon the former until it 's accepted by the latter according to the terms in which the offer war, made. Any qualification of or departure from those terms invalidates the .offer, unless the same be agreed to by the person who made it. Until the terms of the agreement have received the assent of both parties, the negotiation is ojien and imposes no obligation upon either.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.