17 Utah 2d 240 - Smith v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1988
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 12 Utah 2d 350 - Wellman v. Noble · Morrison v. Perry · 11 Utah 2d 67 - State v. Garcia · Wheat v. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. · Hepworth v. Covey Bros. Amusement Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject to the provisions of Rule 61, a new trial may be granted ... for any of the following causes ... (2) Misconduct of the jury; and whenever any one or more of the jurors have been induced to assent to any general or special verdict, or to a finding on any question submitted to them by the court, by resort to a determination by chance or as a result of bribery, such misconduct may be proved by the affidavit of any one of the jurors.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Couch · Hillier v. Lamborn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.