Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 Va. App. 480 - Hill v. Commonwealth

17 Va. App. 480 - Hill v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2010

16 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kirkpatrick v. Commonwealth · Turner v. Commonwealth · Donahue v. Commonwealth · Boyd v. Commonwealth · Eccles v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Commonwealth suggests that because the proof only had to establish more than one-half ounce of marijuana, the trier of fact could have inferred that 2.98 ounces, less the mature stalk and the seeds, exceed one-half ounce. On the evidence in this record, any such inference would have been purely speculative because no facts were proved that would have supported such an infer ence. Therefore, the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.