Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 VI 193 - Remole v. Sullivan

Remole v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2011

2 district · 1 state decisions

201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 3

Relies on Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc. · State v. Manus · Hanes Corporation, a North Carolina Corporation v. Julien Millard · Varlack v. SWC Caribbean, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an anachronism from the 1932 Restatement of Contracts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Unenforceability on Grounds of Public Policy,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.