Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 VI 46 - Cohen v. Raedler

Cohen v. Raedler’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 2011
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2011

1 district ·

201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · 68 Wis. 2d 487 - Calero v. Del Chemical Corp. · M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Co. v. Wadley · Picard v. Brennan · Tarrant American Savings Bank v. Smokeless Fuel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An occasion makes a publication conditionally privileged if the circumstances induce a correct or reasonable belief that (a) there is information that affects a sufficiently important interest of the publisher, and (b) the recipient’s knowledge of the defamatory matter will be of service in the lawful protection of the interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) a false and defamatory statement concerning another; (b) an unprivileged publication to a third party; (c) fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and (d) either actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm or the existence of special harm caused by the publication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.