Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 Vt. 299

Washburn v. Ramsdell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1845

Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1845-02-15

Assumpsit upon a promissory note for 8118,88, dated February 20, 1842, and made payable to Erastus Ramsdell, or order, on demand with interest, arid by the said Erastus indorsed to the plaintiffs, who brought this action as indorsees, alleging that the in-dorsement was made on the day of the date of the note. Plea, the general issue, and trial by the court.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1895

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1845-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams, Ch. J.

¶2The proposition, that, when a person, who is a competent witness, is alive and can be produced as a witness, his declarations are hot admissible in evidence, is clear and plain, and has been too often decided, to admit of a doubt at this time ; and this is decisive of the case before us. The declarations of Erastus Ramsdell and his receipt, — which was but an admission, — could not be received in evidence, when he was alive, and could be produced.

¶3The receipt, or declaration, of a payee of a note has never been held as admissible in evidence, in a suit to which he was not a party, when, at the time he made them, he was not holder of the note. It was not proved, in this case, that Erastus Ramsdell was holder of the note, at the time the receipt was executed, or at the time the *302conversation between him and Job Ramsdell was held ; nor was it proved that the note was not indorsed on the day'it purported to have been indorsed.

¶4The judgment of the county court is therefore affirmed.

/17/vt/299 · .json · Public domain