Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 WASH 626 - Howlett v. Cheetham

Howlett v. Cheetham’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2012

2 district · 17 state decisions

301897190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schettler v. . Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ Tt is indispensable,’ says Sutherland in his valuable treatise on Statutory Construction, § 218, ‘to a correct understanding of a statute to inquire first what is the subject of it, what object is intended to be accomplished by it. When the subject-matter is once clearly ascertained and its general intent, the key is found to all its intricacies; general words may be restrained to it, and those of narrower import may be expanded to embrace it to effectuate that intent. When the intention can be collected from the statute, words may be modified, altered or supplied so as to obviate any repugnancy or inconsistence with such intention.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Applying the principles so clearly enunciated in the foregoing quotation, we are irresistibly forced to the conclusion that it was not the real intention of the legislation to repeal the act of March 22, 1895, notwithstanding the words of absolute repeal employed by the legislature. It will manifestly appear from an examination of this so-called repealing act, and from the history of its passage, that the legislature at the time of its final enactment did not have in mind either the office of arid land commissioner or the subject of arid lands.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] title which is misleading and false is not constitutionally framed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.