State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 85 Wash. 2d 29 - State v. Williams · 87 Wash. 2d 253 - City of Seattle v. Crockett · 87 Wash. 2d 467 - State v. Jack · 13 Wash. App. 849 - State v. Espeland · 74 Wash. 2d 696 - State v. Gregory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is clear that defendant did not request a trial date beyond the 60-day rule. . . . There is nothing in the record to support the contention that defense counsel's letter caused the delay beyond the 60-day requirement of the rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“postponement . . . requested by the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.