Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 WIS2D 455 - State v. Gecht

State v. Gecht’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 1990
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1990

10 state decisions

601962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brock v. State of North Carolina · State v. Witte · State v. Evjue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the trial court makes an ultimate determination of not guilty and where, as here, there is no claim of procedural error against the state during the course of trial but where, as here, the trial court in making his ultimate determination does so principally in his capacity as the trier of fact, then any errors on questions of law announced by the court that may have been a basis for his decision are not reviewable. In appraising the lower court’s determination, any doubts as to whether the trial court is acting in the capacity of trier of fact are to be resolved in favor of the defendant. Only in this way will he be assured the protection that the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy provides. “In the instant case the trial court was ruling principally in his capacity as trier of fact and since for that reason his determination is not reviewable here we are not required to pass on the two additional elements that the state contends the trial court erroneously required the state to prove to win a conviction. . . .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . The constitutional guaranty protecting a person from double jeopardy is one of the most-fundamental rights in our society. This court will do all in its power to uphold that guaranty. . . .” State v. Gecht (1962), 17 Wis. 2d 455, 458 , 117 N. W. 2d 340 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““. . . and no person for the same offence shall be put twice in jeopardy of punishment, . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.