Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

170 Ala. 101

Clark v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 9, 1911

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1911-02-09

<p> Adultery. </p> <p>Adultery; Evidence; Corrohoration. — On a trial for adultery with a certain woman, it was competent to show that at that time she was pregnant as tending to show that she and the defendant had be^p having illicit intercourse.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1917

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1911-02-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ANDERSON, J.-

¶1The defendant was indicted for living in adultery with one “Bass Clark,” a woman, and the fact that the said “Bass” was pregnant at the time of the trial was a circumstance, corroborating the state’s theory that the defendant had illicit intercourse with her.

¶2This being the only exception disclosed by the record, the judgment of the county court is affirmed.

¶3Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Sayre and Somervill, JJ., concur.
/170/ala/101 · .json · Public domain