Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 Ariz. 256 - Bledsoe v. Goodfarb

Bledsoe v. Goodfarb’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Piner v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa (1998), Herman v. City of Tucson (1999)

1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

230199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Orme School v. Reeves · 93 Wis. 2d 433 - Wirth v. Ehly · Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. · Walker v. City of Scottsdale · Harrison v. Middlesex Water Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “agricultural, range, mining or forest lands, and any other similar lands.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Donnie Rayford Tate, Jr. Chea Tate v. Harold M. Cole First State Service Corporation, an Arizona Corporation Sierra Vista Land and Development Company, a Joint Venture Dom Construction Company, a Sole Proprietorship Dominic Troncale, Donnie Rayford Tate, Jr. Chea Tate v. Harold M. Cole First State Service Corporation, an Arizona Corporation Sierra Vista Land and Development Company, a Joint Venture Dom Construction Company, a Sole Proprietorship Dominic Troncale Pate Contractors, Inc., an Arizona Corporation Herman Pate City of Sierra Vista, Arizona

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.