State v. Boston’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler · 35 Cal. 3d 161 - People v. Hall · 517 So. 2d 1346 - Lockett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race. Second, if that showing is made, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to articulate a race-neutral explanation for striking the juror in question. Third, the trial court must determine whether the defense has carried its burden of proving purposeful discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.