In Re Eiland’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 528 (§ 229 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Rimgale Ravenot v. S Rimgale · Leser Jj Mickelson v. J Leser K · First of America Bank v. Gaylor (In Re Gaylor) · In Re Kovich · McCullough v. Brown (In Re Brown)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plan may ... designate a class or classes of unsecured claims, as provided in section 1122 of this title, but may not discriminate unfairly against any class so designated....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Orawsky
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.