Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 BR 404 - In Re Mills

In Re Mills’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
April 2012
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2012

1 district ·

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. · Watt v. Alaska · Gleason v. Thaw · Ohio v. Kovacs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The “cancellation” provisions of Section 329(b) are meaningless if Congress intended the obligations to be automatically discharged. Although it is well established that exceptions to discharge should be narrowly construed to preserve the debtor’s “fresh start,” ... it does not follow that the discharge provisions should be read to obliterate the purpose of a free-standing section in the same statutory scheme. As the Supreme Court has said, “statutory construction is a holistic endeavor.” ... The goal is to harmonize conflicting statutes, not to render one of them meaningless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.