Mercer v. Monzack’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Mathews v. Weber · United States v. Valencia-Copete · Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The debtor shall file a list of property that the debtor claims as exempt under subsection (b) of this section.... Unless a party in interest objects, the property claimed as exempt on such a list is exempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mercer v. Monzack
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.