In Re Winebrenner’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2016
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 546 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Costello v. United States · Jacoway v. Anderson · First National Bank of Jacksboro v. Lasater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]roperty of the estate that is not abandoned under [Sec. 554] and that is not administered in the case remains property of the estate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.